![]() ![]() When it comes to file organisation/digital asset management (DAM), both options allow classic catalogues.your default basic edit workspace and another for layer edits, exposure stacking etc. You can save each of these parameters in workspaces, allowing you to quickly switch between interfaces, e.g. Remove tools you don't tend to use, put the ones you use most in prominent places and increase their size, organise tools and functions in tabs of your choosing. Capture One, however, allows for extensive customisation, allowing you to tailor the interface to your needs. In the video, the GUI (graphic user interface) is shown as rather similar.In that case, you're certainly getting a better deal from an Adobe subscription. tools in Capture One are insufficient for advanced edits, you're straight out of luck. If you need Photoshop, there is no Capture One substitute.(If you go down this route, note that there are discounts on Capture One Pro from time to time, allowing you to save some money - especially on outgoing versions before new releases.) This is a larger one-time expense, but if you keep camera bodies for a few years, don't always need the latest features and don't need Photoshop, staying on a perpetual license a few years can be cheaper than maintaining a monthly subscription - especially with intermittent amateur/enthusiast use. Unlike Adobe, Capture One still offers perpetual licenses. The Capture One subscription is pricier. ![]() The Adobe subscription is cheaper if you maintain the subscription all year, also want to use Photoshop, and want to stay on current versions for latest features and camera compatibility.By all means check out LR, but allow me to make some high level observations having switched to Capture One a few years back:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |